🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include decreasing the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid wider concerns about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of corporate influence globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global recommended threshold”, delayed for at least twelve months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least half of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but asserts that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and harvest that and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative stated: “The company operates its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, mentioning that minors should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to realize planned population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, adding that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which includes rising levels of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.