🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently following popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."